I'm just thinking at the keyboard, and I'll say it: I think one of the most gratifying things for a writer is a reader who understands your characters.
I've been thinking about how people read books, and how we, in some cases, see the words, the characters, tropes, through our SF lenses or through our medieval fantasy spectacles. I think contemporary fantasy has had some trouble getting a footing--even with a third of the shelf space that now seems to be devoted to urban, contemporary fantasy, steampunk, and other forms of our genre that do not contain a single elf and aren't set in Medieval Europe (or similar world).
When I sent the first three chapters of Seaborn around to the workshop--at the time I was in the writing workshop Jeff Carver and Craig Shaw Gardner run every year here in Boston--nearly everyone thought it was SF. And when I said, "no, I'm writing fantasy," they said, "look, here's a woman scuba diving--how can you have scuba gear in a fantasy novel?"
You can...
I think it just makes reading it a little harder, and don't expect everyone who browses the F&SF shelves to get what you're trying to do.
If you're using tropes--common themes--like vampires, summoning demons, pirates, dragons, witches lighting candles, sorcerers chanting--all of which I love BTW (everyone knows I have a total thing for witches and demons), you're writing with some cultural (or popular) momentum. When you write about something a little off the genre map (in my case, humans who breathe underwater) or types and settings that just don't sit well with a lot of people, I think it makes everything--describing, categorizing, shelving, marketing your story, characters, and their motives that much more difficult.
Part of me wants to think that SF readers are happier--than fantasy readers--to accept something way off the mark, but I'm not sure about this. And I'm even less sure about SF readers when they read fantasy.
What do you think?
.
Recent Comments